HIGH ART = LOW ART

by veepho

High Art = Low Art

Why there is a need for endless debate on legitimacy of art, I do not understand.
What is art?
–Art is an expression, of any form in any medium, for any purpose.
—Perhaps only the creator will identify with it, perhaps millions will, it doesn’t matter.
—-A true expression, a raw expression, an expression carrying impact (of the slightest or most grandiose weight) for/to/with someone (regardless of who) is art.

To you music snobs out there– really? why?…seriously. WHY?
Stop telling people they’re doing (_____insert any given action_____) wrong, improperly etc.
—–without denying technical knowledge, there is more than one way to do things…so, STOP IT.

I can float with Gustav Mahler,
headbang to Iron Maiden,
get intoxicated with van der graaf generator,
make love to prince,
indulge in roxy music,
cry with the goo goo dolls,
harmonize with the backstreet boys,
break rules with Lady Gaga,
LIVE with kurt cobain,
get personal with Britney Spears,
and be “me, myself and I” with de la soul.
—I don’t see a problem in appreciating a variety of music.
—-SO listen. Stop h8ing on other people’s music choices and focus your energy on other things…

HIGH ART IS LOW ART
LOW ART IS HIGH ART
because.
ART is ART.

“pop music will never be low brow” -lady gaga

… afterall, you’ll never see me with a low brow.

xx
-v

Advertisements